[FCE] ‘Worrying’ pollution in Cotswolds river – volunteers

🎧 Listen to today’s podcast

📚 Key Vocabulary

Word Definition 中文
picturesque visually attractive, especially in a quaint or pretty style. 风景如画的
dedicated giving a lot of time and energy to something because it is important. 投入的,尽职的
significant important, large, or noticeable. 重要的,大量的
urging strongly advising or trying to persuade someone to do something. 敦促,力劝
comprehensive including or dealing with all or nearly all elements or aspects of something. 全面的,综合的
proximity nearness in space, time, or relationship. 接近,邻近
decline a gradual continuous loss of strength, numbers, or quality. 下降,衰落
persistent continuing to exist or happen, especially for longer than desirable or usual. 持续的,顽强的

📖 Read the Article

Pollution Concerns Mount in Picturesque Cotswolds River

Volunteers in the picturesque Cotswolds region of England have reported “worryingly high” levels of pollution in the River Isbourne, prompting urgent calls for action. For over a year, a dedicated group of residents in Winchcombe, Gloucestershire, collaborating with the charity Winchcombe Green Town, has been conducting weekly water quality tests. Their recent findings reveal significant amounts of phosphates and nitrates, raising serious environmental concerns.

The River Isbourne, approximately 14 miles long, originates at Cleeve Hill and flows into the River Avon. Stuart Pickles, a trustee for Winchcombe Green Town, highlighted the absence of reliable water quality data before their project began. Utilising scientific evidence gathered from four designated testing sites, the volunteers are now urging the Environment Agency to launch a comprehensive investigation. Beyond nitrates and phosphates, their monitoring efforts also include electro-conductivity levels and temperature, factors known to influence overall water quality.

The volunteers suspect that agricultural fertilisers used in the surrounding areas are the primary source of nitrates, while phosphates are more likely to stem from sewage outlets. Mr. Pickles personally expressed his shock at the results, especially given his proximity to the river and his dog’s use of it. Many local residents, including Mr. Pickles, had previously assumed the river was clean due to Winchcombe’s location near its source, far from heavy industrial pollution downstream. However, the collected data challenges this long-held belief. Jim Mason, chairman of Winchcombe Town Council, which provided funding for the testing kits, described the findings as “very disturbing,” noting a noticeable decline in local wildlife, such as fish and birds.

In response to these anxieties, Severn Trent Water, the region’s water company, stated their commitment to river health through a £160 million investment across Gloucestershire. They also reported a nearly 50% reduction in storm overflow spills at the Winchcombe Sewage Treatment Works between 2024 and 2025. Furthermore, the company asserts that phosphorous emissions from the treatment works in 2025 were less than a third of the legally permitted limit.

Despite these declared efforts, the continuous monitoring by volunteers underscores a persistent environmental challenge. The local community remains hopeful for a thorough official investigation to safeguard this vital natural resource for future generations.

✏️ Reading Practice

1. What is the main purpose of the article?

  • A.To report on Severn Trent Water’s investment in river health.
  • B.To highlight community efforts to uncover and address river pollution in the Cotswolds.
  • C.To explain the different sources of nitrates and phosphates in rivers.
  • D.To describe the River Isbourne’s journey from Cleeve Hill to the River Avon.

2. According to the article, what factors, besides nitrates and phosphates, do volunteers monitor in the River Isbourne?

  • A.The overall flow rate and water depth.
  • B.The presence of industrial chemicals and heavy metals.
  • C.Electro-conductivity levels and temperature.
  • D.The number of fish species and bird populations.

3. What can be inferred about the local community’s previous perception of the River Isbourne?

  • A.They generally believed it was clean due to its proximity to the source.
  • B.They were aware of pollution but lacked concrete evidence.
  • C.They were concerned about agricultural runoff but not sewage.
  • D.They thought it was heavily polluted by downstream industries.

4. What is Jim Mason’s attitude towards the pollution findings?

  • A.He is indifferent, as he expected such results.
  • B.He is cautiously optimistic about the water company’s efforts.
  • C.He is confused about the origin of the pollutants.
  • D.He is greatly concerned, citing a noticeable impact on local wildlife.

5. In paragraph 1, the word “prompting” is closest in meaning to:

  • A.discouraging
  • B.causing
  • C.preventing
  • D.questioning