[FCE] An AI-generated band got 1m plays on Spotify. Now music insiders say listeners should be warned | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian

收听本期播客

阅读正文

In a surprising turn of events in the music industry, an AI-generated band named Velvet Sundown has taken the streaming world by storm, amassing over one million streams on Spotify in just a few weeks. The band, which released two albums, ‘Floating On Echoes’ and ‘Dust And Silence’, initially appeared to be a genuine group with a classic country folk sound. However, it was later uncovered that every aspect of Velvet Sundown—the music, images, and even their backstory—was created using artificial intelligence. This revelation has sparked a fierce debate about honesty and transparency in the music world.

The rise of Velvet Sundown highlights the increasing role of AI in creative industries. The band was described as a project shaped by human ideas but heavily reliant on an AI platform called Suno to produce its tracks. At first, Velvet Sundown denied being an AI creation, with conflicting claims emerging—one supposed band member even called it an ‘art hoax’. Eventually, the band’s official channels admitted the truth, describing themselves as a blend of human and machine. This lack of clarity from the outset has frustrated listeners and industry professionals alike.

The incident has prompted calls for greater regulation of AI-generated content on streaming platforms. Music industry leaders argue that services like Spotify should be legally required to label AI-made music, ensuring listeners are aware of what they are hearing. Roberto Neri from the Ivors Academy voiced concerns over transparency and the rights of human artists, while Sophie Jones from the British Phonographic Industry stressed that AI should enhance, not replace, human creativity. There is also growing unease that independent musicians could suffer if their work is used to train AI systems without consent or compensation, a problem seen in past controversies involving famous artists.

This situation underlines how rapidly technology is transforming the music industry, often outpacing the laws designed to regulate it. While some view AI as a powerful tool with exciting possibilities, others warn it could harm creators if not carefully managed. The debate continues over whether listeners should always be informed if music is AI-generated or if it should simply be seen as another form of creative expression.

阅读练习

1. What is the main reason Velvet Sundown caused controversy in the music industry?

  • A. Their music was unpopular with listeners.
  • B. They were revealed to be an AI-generated band.
  • C. Their albums were released too quickly.
  • D. They refused to use streaming platforms.

2. How did Velvet Sundown initially respond to claims about their origins?

  • A. They immediately admitted to being AI-generated.
  • B. They ignored all questions about their creation.
  • C. They denied being an AI creation at first.
  • D. They claimed to be a fully human band forever.

3. What do music industry leaders want streaming platforms to do?

  • A. Ban all AI-generated music from their services.
  • B. Label music created by AI for transparency.
  • C. Promote AI music over human-made tracks.
  • D. Charge more for streaming AI-generated content.

4. What concern is mentioned about independent musicians?

  • A. They might not be able to use AI technology.
  • B. Their music could be used to train AI without permission.
  • C. They are unable to compete with larger bands.
  • D. They are against the use of AI in music.

5. What does the article suggest about the future of AI in music?

  • A. It will likely be banned due to widespread opposition.
  • B. It is seen as having both potential and risks.
  • C. It will completely replace human musicians soon.
  • D. It is unlikely to develop further in the industry.