博客

[FCE] ‘It’s too late to be scared’: readers on the controversial rise of AI ‘actors’ | Movies | The Guardian

收听本期播客

阅读正文

In the ever-evolving world of entertainment, a new and controversial figure has emerged: Tilly Norwood, a virtual ‘actor’ created entirely by artificial intelligence (AI). Unlike traditional stars, Tilly is not a human but a computer-generated character designed to look and sound like a real person. Promoted as a potential rival to famous actresses like Scarlett Johansson, Tilly has ignited a heated debate across Hollywood and among global audiences. This development raises critical questions about the future of filmmaking and the role of human talent in an increasingly digital age.

The technology behind Tilly Norwood represents a significant leap in AI capabilities. Originally used for special effects, AI can now craft complete characters that ‘perform’ in films without the need for human actors. For major streaming platforms like Netflix, which invest billions annually in content, this innovation promises substantial cost savings. By eliminating expenses such as actor salaries, makeup teams, and even set design, studios could boost their profits. However, the introduction of Tilly has sparked widespread criticism. Many actors, directors, and viewers fear that this trend could sideline human performers, threatening the very essence of cinematic art.

Public opinion on AI ‘actors’ remains divided. Some see this as a groundbreaking step forward, praising the efficiency and creativity it brings to filmmaking. Others, however, are less convinced. A reader of The Guardian described Tilly’s performances as ‘soulless,’ arguing that AI lacks the emotional depth and humor that human actors naturally convey. Another concern is that Hollywood executives might prioritize financial gains over quality, potentially alienating audiences. Some even predict that fans could turn to creating their own AI-generated content, bypassing studio productions altogether.

The implications of this shift are far-reaching. There are growing worries about job losses in the film industry, not only for actors but also for supporting roles like camera operators and technicians. Yet, some argue that AI is an inevitable part of the future, and those affected must adapt by finding new opportunities within the evolving landscape. As the debate rages on, one thing is certain: the rise of AI ‘actors’ like Tilly Norwood challenges fundamental ideas about creativity, technology, and the unique value of human expression in art.

阅读练习

1. What is the main reason Tilly Norwood has caused controversy in Hollywood?

  • A. She is more popular than human actors.
  • B. She is a virtual character created by AI.
  • C. She has replaced famous actresses like Scarlett Johansson.
  • D. She is too expensive for studios to use.

2. According to the article, how could AI actors benefit streaming platforms like Netflix?

  • A. By improving the quality of acting in films.
  • B. By attracting more famous actors to their projects.
  • C. By reducing costs related to production.
  • D. By making films more emotionally engaging.

3. What is one criticism of Tilly Norwood’s performances mentioned in the article?

  • A. They are too expensive to produce.
  • B. They lack emotional depth.
  • C. They are too similar to human actors.
  • D. They are not creative enough for modern audiences.

4. What does the article suggest might happen if Hollywood focuses on AI actors for financial reasons?

  • A. Audiences might lose interest and create their own content.
  • B. Human actors will become more popular than ever.
  • C. Film quality will improve significantly.
  • D. Studios will stop using AI technology altogether.

5. What does the article imply about the future of AI in the film industry?

  • A. It will completely replace human actors soon.
  • B. It is unlikely to have a lasting impact.
  • C. It is a permanent change that people must adjust to.
  • D. It will only be used for minor roles in films.