博客

[FCE] ‘Cool and quirky is part of our brand’: how New Zealand became a hothouse for indie games

收听本期播客

阅读正文

In the highly competitive global video game market, New Zealand is emerging as an unexpected yet formidable force. The nation’s independent game developers are achieving international acclaim for their creative and commercially successful titles, a trend highlighted at the recent Pax Australia gaming conference. While talent is widespread in the industry, New Zealand’s remarkable rise is largely attributed to a unique and effective government support programme.

This impressive ascent is not merely anecdotal; it is strongly supported by official figures. In the past year alone, total revenue for New Zealand’s local game studios surged by an impressive 38% to reach NZ$759 million. To provide some context, this figure is almost double the sum generated by Australia’s gaming sector. A significant driver of this growth has been a government initiative known as Code, or the Centre of Digital Excellence.

What distinguishes the Code programme from traditional grant schemes is its philosophy of empowerment. Rather than simply providing financial aid, Code focuses on making developers self-reliant by equipping them with vital business skills. The programme offers a comprehensive package that includes grants, mentorship from global industry experts, and practical workshops on essential topics such as marketing, budgeting, and media relations. This holistic approach is designed to give small studios the necessary tools to compete internationally and achieve long-term independence from government funding.

The strategy has yielded clear dividends. For every dollar the government invests through Code, the programme generates a return of NZ$2.67 for the local economy. Beyond the impressive financial return, the initiative has cultivated a dynamic and collaborative community where developers are known to share ideas, contacts, and experiences to support mutual success. This nurturing environment encourages the creation of unique games that stand out in a crowded marketplace. The success of hit titles like ‘Dredge’, which received support from the programme, has in turn inspired a new wave of local creators.

阅读练习

1. What is the main purpose of the article?

  • A. To compare the gaming industries of New Zealand and Australia.
  • B. To explain the key factors behind New Zealand’s success in game development.
  • C. To promote the new video game ‘Dredge’ to an international audience.
  • D. To argue for an increase in government funding for all creative arts.

2. According to the text, how does the Code programme differ from typical government funding?

  • A. It provides significantly more money to each developer.
  • B. It is managed directly by international industry experts.
  • C. It concentrates on building business knowledge alongside financial support.
  • D. It is exclusively for developers who have already released a successful game.

3. What does the article suggest about the community of game developers in New Zealand?

  • A. They are highly competitive and rarely work together.
  • B. They have created a cooperative and supportive network.
  • C. They are mainly focused on competing with Australian studios.
  • D. They struggle to find inspiration for new game ideas.

4. In the first paragraph, the phrase ‘a formidable force’ means that New Zealand’s game industry is becoming…

  • A. very large.
  • B. wealthy.
  • C. creative.
  • D. powerful and respected.

5. What is stated about the financial performance of New Zealand’s game industry?

  • A. It has grown by a total of NZ$759 million in the last year.
  • B. It generates significantly more revenue than its Australian counterpart.
  • C. It is expected to double its revenue again in the near future.
  • D. It returns NZ$2.67 to the developers for every dollar invested.