博客

[FCE] US puts £31bn tech ‘prosperity deal’ with Britain on ice

收听本期播客

阅读正文

A significant multi-billion-pound investment by the United States into the British technology sector has been put on hold, casting a shadow over the “tech prosperity deal.” Valued at an impressive £31 billion, this agreement represented a substantial commitment from leading US tech companies, including Microsoft and Google, to invest in the UK.

The deal was initially announced with considerable enthusiasm in September during a state visit by then-President Donald Trump. Prime Minister Keir Starmer lauded it as a “generational step change” in US-UK relations. It promised to establish an artificial intelligence growth zone in the North-East of England, a move expected to generate up to £30 billion and create thousands of new jobs, boosting regional economies.

However, Washington has now decided to pause the implementation of this ambitious agreement. The primary reason given for the delay is the United Kingdom’s insufficient progress in reducing trade barriers in other vital sectors. British officials, keen to minimise the seriousness of the situation, have described it as “the usual bit of hardball negotiations” by their American counterparts.

Two main areas of disagreement are particularly contentious. Firstly, the US administration has repeatedly expressed its dissatisfaction with the UK’s digital services tax. This levy imposes a 2% charge on the revenues of major technology firms such as Amazon, Google, and Apple, bringing in approximately £800 million annually for the UK government. Secondly, the US has raised concerns regarding the UK’s stringent food safety rules. These regulations currently prevent the import of certain American agricultural products, including chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef, due to differing health and safety standards.

For the UK government, this pause is undeniably a setback. The prosperity deal was considered a key achievement in its efforts to strengthen economic ties with the US and avoid the imposition of punitive tariffs on British exports. Negotiations are continuing, with senior British officials actively engaging with their American counterparts to resolve these issues and other broader trade matters. While both nations maintain that their “special relationship” remains robust, the current situation highlights the complex challenges countries face in balancing national interests with the advantages of international trade agreements.

阅读练习

1. What is the main topic of the article?

  • A. The history of US-UK trade relations.
  • B. The reasons behind the US decision to delay a major investment in the UK.
  • C. The details of the UK’s new digital services tax.
  • D. The impact of food safety rules on international trade.

2. How much was the ‘tech prosperity deal’ initially valued at?

  • A. £800 million
  • B. £2 billion
  • C. £30 billion
  • D. £31 billion

3. According to the article, what was one of the expected benefits of the ‘tech prosperity deal’ for the North-East of England?

  • A. An increase in agricultural exports to the US.
  • B. The creation of a new digital services tax.
  • C. The development of an artificial intelligence growth zone.
  • D. A reduction in trade barriers with the US.

4. When British officials described the situation as ‘the usual bit of hardball negotiations,’ what did they most likely mean?

  • A. They were surprised by the Americans’ aggressive negotiation tactics.
  • B. They believed the Americans were making fair and reasonable demands.
  • C. They suggested the Americans were using tough tactics, which was a common occurrence.
  • D. They were admitting their own government had been too rigid in negotiations.

5. The article suggests that for the UK government, the pause in the deal is:

  • A. a minor inconvenience that will soon be resolved.
  • B. a significant disappointment despite ongoing diplomatic efforts.
  • C. a positive development as it allows for reassessment of policies.
  • D. an inevitable outcome given the history of US-UK relations.