博客

[FCE] ‘Nobody wants a robot to read them a story!’ The creatives and academics rejecting AI – at work and at home | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian

收听本期播客

阅读正文

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a significant part of our lives, with tools like ChatGPT transforming how we work and create. However, a growing number of creatives and academics are rejecting AI, citing concerns about its impact on human creativity, ethics, and society. This resistance is sparking a wider debate about the role of technology in our future.

Among those leading the pushback is novelist Ewan Morrison, who has publicly criticized AI for its inaccuracy. When testing ChatGPT, he found it generated fake book titles he never wrote, highlighting the unreliability of such tools. Morrison refuses to use AI in his writing, arguing that it diminishes the human essence of storytelling. He is also troubled by ethical issues, such as copyright violations, since AI systems are often trained on existing works without permission, posing a threat to artists’ and writers’ livelihoods.

Similarly, audiobook narrator April Doty fears AI could replace human narrators in her field. She believes machines cannot replicate the emotional depth and nuance a person brings to a story. Additionally, Doty is concerned about the environmental impact of AI, noting the enormous energy required to run these systems. To reduce her contribution to this problem, she has switched to alternative search engines. Linguistics professor Emily Bender shares a related view, questioning the worth of AI-generated content. She argues it lacks the personal connection inherent in human work and warns that over-reliance on AI could weaken community ties and increase isolation.

The resistance to AI goes beyond personal objections, touching on broader societal issues. Many fear widespread job losses as AI begins to replace workers in various industries. Ethical concerns also loom large, including privacy violations by tech companies and the potential misuse of AI in areas like weaponry. However, not everyone is pessimistic. Filmmaker Justine Bateman predicts that audiences will soon tire of AI-generated content, which she describes as unoriginal and emotionally shallow, and will instead seek out authentic, human-made creations.

As AI continues to promise efficiency and innovation, it is clear that not everyone is ready to embrace it. This movement raises critical questions about balancing technological progress with the value of human creativity. The debate is far from over, and opinions remain divided on whether AI should dominate our future or if the human touch should remain at the heart of art and work.

阅读练习

1. What is the main reason Ewan Morrison rejects AI in his writing?

  • A. It is too expensive to use.
  • B. It produces unreliable information.
  • C. It lacks environmental sustainability.
  • D. It is difficult to understand.

2. What concern does April Doty have about AI besides its impact on her profession?

  • A. Its effect on community relationships.
  • B. Its high financial cost.
  • C. Its environmental consequences.
  • D. Its inaccuracy in content creation.

3. According to Emily Bender, what is a key problem with AI-generated content?

  • A. It is too complex for most users.
  • B. It lacks a human connection.
  • C. It is not widely accessible.
  • D. It is often outdated.

4. What does Justine Bateman believe about the future of AI content?

  • A. It will become more popular than human content.
  • B. It will improve in emotional depth over time.
  • C. Audiences will prefer human-made creations instead.
  • D. It will dominate all forms of artistic expression.

5. What broader societal issue related to AI is mentioned in the article?

  • A. The lack of training for AI users.
  • B. The potential loss of jobs.
  • C. The difficulty of regulating AI companies.
  • D. The high cost of AI technology.