[FCE] Europe’s next-generation fighter jet project may collapse if row continues, says warplane maker

收听本期播客

阅读正文

Europe’s ambitious plan for its next-generation fighter jet, the Future Combat Air System (FCAS), is currently facing a serious risk of collapse. This major continental defence cooperation, valued at approximately €100 billion, involves France, Germany, and Spain. The project aims to develop not only an advanced fighter jet but also autonomous drones and a sophisticated communications network.

However, the core component – the fighter jet itself – has experienced significant delays due to disagreements between the two main companies responsible: France’s Dassault Aviation and Airbus’s defence division, which represents Germany and Spain. Éric Trappier, the chief executive of Dassault Aviation, has publicly stated that Airbus is unwilling to cooperate on how the development workload for the jet should be shared. Dassault believes it was chosen to lead the fighter jet’s design, a position that Airbus apparently disputes. Mr. Trappier warned explicitly that if Airbus “maintains its position of not wanting to work with Dassault, the matter is dead.” This ongoing dispute highlights broader challenges in European defence collaboration, particularly as many nations seek to strengthen their military capabilities.

Adding to these complications, Germany has expressed reservations regarding the jet’s design. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz previously questioned whether the proposed warplane would suit Germany’s specific requirements, such as its nuclear capability, which is a key French demand. Both Mr. Merz and Airbus’s chief executive, Guillaume Faury, have suggested potential alternative approaches, including splitting the project into two separate aircraft or continuing with other elements of FCAS while the jet component faces difficulties.

Furthermore, there are indications that Germany might consider joining an alternative programme. The United Kingdom, in collaboration with Italy and Japan, is developing its own next-generation combat aircraft known as Tempest, or GCAP. This competing project is anticipated to be operational five years earlier than FCAS, around 2035. Rolls-Royce, a company involved in manufacturing engines for the British jet, has already welcomed the prospect of Germany’s participation.

France, Germany, and Spain now stand at a crucial point. They must decide whether to proceed with the next phase of the FCAS fighter jet or potentially abandon it to focus solely on the other components of the defence system. The outcome will undoubtedly have significant implications for European defence strategy and industrial cooperation.

阅读练习

1. What is the primary focus of the article?

  • A. The historical development of European defence projects.
  • B. The challenges and potential failure of the FCAS fighter jet project.
  • C. The technological advancements of the Future Combat Air System.
  • D. The competitive market for fighter jet manufacturers in Europe.

2. According to the article, what is *not* a planned component of the Future Combat Air System (FCAS)?

  • A. Autonomous drones.
  • B. An advanced communications network.
  • C. Naval warships.
  • D. A sophisticated fighter jet.

3. What is the main reason for the dispute between Dassault Aviation and Airbus’s defence division?

  • A. Disagreements over the overall budget for the FCAS project.
  • B. A conflict regarding the sharing of the jet’s development workload.
  • C. Concerns about the fighter jet’s nuclear capability.
  • D. Competition over manufacturing engines for the new aircraft.

4. What does the phrase ‘the matter is dead’ imply, according to Éric Trappier?

  • A. The project will be completed without Airbus’s involvement.
  • B. The project will be permanently stopped if no agreement is reached.
  • C. The current phase of development is now finished.
  • D. Airbus has decided to withdraw from the project entirely.

5. How does the Tempest (GCAP) project compare to FCAS?

  • A. Tempest involves more European countries than FCAS.
  • B. Tempest is expected to be operational at a later date than FCAS.
  • C. Tempest is a similar project by different nations, set to be ready sooner.
  • D. Tempest is an older, less advanced fighter jet system.