博客

[FCE] UK actors vote to refuse to be digitally scanned in pushback against AI

收听本期播客

阅读正文

In a landmark decision for the performing arts, UK actors have overwhelmingly voted to oppose digital scanning, signaling a significant pushback against the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) within creative industries. Members of Equity, the prominent union representing performing artists, were asked if they would decline to be digitally scanned on set – a process that captures actors’ physical appearances for potential future use. A remarkable 99% voted in favour of refusing this practice.

This recent vote serves as an indicative ballot, meaning it strongly reflects the members’ sentiments but does not yet offer legal protection for those who decline scanning. However, Paul Fleming, Equity’s general secretary, described AI as a “generation-defining challenge.” He emphasised that this outcome clearly demonstrates members’ willingness to disrupt productions unless robust protections for performers are established. Equity now intends to enter negotiations with Pact, the trade organisation representing most UK producers, to establish new minimum standards for pay and working conditions in film and television. Should these discussions prove successful, Equity may then conduct a formal ballot, which, if passed, would grant actors legal grounds to refuse digital scanning.

The decision comes after months of growing apprehension regarding performers’ rights as AI technology becomes more deeply embedded in the creative sector. Several well-known actors, including Adrian Lester, Hugh Bonneville, and Harriet Walter, have publicly endorsed Equity’s campaign. Hugh Bonneville highlighted the importance of actors’ likenesses and voices not being exploited without their explicit consent. Similarly, acclaimed actress Olivia Williams pointed out how performers often face pressure to undergo body scans without retaining any control over how this data is subsequently used, sometimes resulting in studios acquiring indefinite rights to their digital images. These concerns were also a key point during the Hollywood writers’ strike in 2023, where both writers and actors expressed fears that unregulated AI usage could fundamentally alter the industry and potentially diminish human roles.

This decisive vote by UK actors marks a crucial moment in the ongoing debate concerning intellectual property and fair compensation in the digital era. It underlines the urgent necessity for new agreements that safeguard artists’ rights as technology continues to advance.

阅读练习

1. What is the main purpose of the article?

  • A. To announce new legislation protecting actors from AI.
  • B. To explain how digital scanning technology works on film sets.
  • C. To report on UK actors’ collective action against digital scanning and AI.
  • D. To compare the UK actors’ strike with the Hollywood writers’ strike.

2. According to the article, what was the outcome of Equity members’ vote regarding digital scanning?

  • A. A small minority of actors voted to accept digital scanning.
  • B. Nearly all actors expressed their refusal to be digitally scanned.
  • C. The vote was postponed due to lack of interest from members.
  • D. Actors voted in favour of negotiating new terms for digital scanning.

3. What does Paul Fleming mean when he calls AI a “generation-defining challenge” for performers?

  • A. That AI offers new opportunities for actors from different generations.
  • B. That AI will replace the need for future generations of actors entirely.
  • C. That AI presents a critical issue that will shape the careers and rights of actors for years to come.
  • D. That AI technology is too complex for the current generation of actors to understand.

4. What key concern did Olivia Williams highlight regarding digital scanning?

  • A. Actors are not paid enough for having their bodies scanned.
  • B. The scanning process itself is physically uncomfortable for performers.
  • C. Performers lose control over how their scanned data is used, sometimes indefinitely.
  • D. Digital scanning technology is not advanced enough to capture actors accurately.

5. What is the crucial difference between an “indicative ballot” and a “formal ballot” according to the text?

  • A. An indicative ballot is a public demonstration, while a formal ballot is private.
  • B. An indicative ballot shows opinion, but only a formal ballot can provide legal protection.
  • C. A formal ballot requires more than 99% agreement, unlike an indicative one.
  • D. An indicative ballot focuses on pay, whereas a formal ballot focuses on working conditions.