[FCE] AI ‘carries risks’ but will help tackle global heating, says UN’s climate chief | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian

收听本期播客

阅读正文

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly seen as a vital tool in the fight against the climate crisis, according to Simon Stiell, the UN’s climate chief. Speaking at the UN General Assembly in New York, Stiell highlighted the potential of AI to transform environmental efforts, while also warning of the risks it poses if not carefully managed. He stressed the urgent need for government oversight to ensure this technology benefits the planet without causing harm.

One of the key advantages of AI lies in its ability to improve energy systems. By making them more efficient, AI reduces waste and supports the creation of tools to lower carbon emissions from industries. The United Nations itself is using AI to aid climate diplomacy, helping nations collaborate on shared environmental targets. Stiell emphasized that AI should not replace human effort but rather free up time for more significant challenges. For example, it can monitor small energy grids, identify areas vulnerable to climate change, and assist in designing resilient communities.

However, there are significant drawbacks. The data centers powering AI consume enormous amounts of energy, which could damage the environment if not addressed. Stiell called on companies to prioritize renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, and to develop more energy-efficient systems. He argued that without strict regulations, the environmental cost of AI might outweigh its benefits.

Despite these challenges, Stiell remains optimistic about global progress on climate action. He noted that the world is edging closer to the goals of the Paris Agreement, a crucial plan to limit global warming. Investment in renewable energy has surged, reaching two trillion dollars last year, with countries like China, the EU, and India leading the charge. However, progress in the US has been hindered by political disagreements.

Yet, Stiell acknowledged that the benefits of a low-carbon future are not evenly distributed. Many people are still waiting to experience positive changes in their lives, while the effects of climate change are becoming more severe. He urged for faster action and greater funding to address these gaps. As the world grapples with balancing AI’s potential and its environmental impact, the need for thoughtful and coordinated efforts has never been clearer.

阅读练习

1. What is the main point Simon Stiell makes about AI in relation to the climate crisis?

  • A. AI is too risky to be used for environmental purposes.
  • B. AI can be a powerful tool if managed with proper regulations.
  • C. AI should completely replace human effort in climate action.
  • D. AI has no significant role in fighting climate change.

2. How is AI currently being used to support climate efforts, according to the article?

  • A. By replacing workers in renewable energy industries.
  • B. By monitoring weather patterns in developing countries.
  • C. By improving energy systems and reducing carbon emissions.
  • D. By funding climate projects in vulnerable areas.

3. What concern does Stiell raise about the use of AI?

  • A. It is too expensive for most countries to adopt.
  • B. It requires a large amount of energy to operate.
  • C. It slows down international climate agreements.
  • D. It cannot be used with renewable energy sources.

4. What does Stiell suggest companies should do to address AI’s environmental impact?

  • A. Stop using AI until better technology is available.
  • B. Focus on reducing the cost of AI systems.
  • C. Use renewable energy and improve energy efficiency.
  • D. Limit AI use to small-scale projects only.

5. What can be inferred about global progress on climate goals from Stiell’s comments?

  • A. All countries have equally achieved the Paris Agreement targets.
  • B. Progress is happening, but not everyone benefits yet.
  • C. There has been no improvement in climate action worldwide.
  • D. Investment in renewable energy has declined in recent years.