[FCE] Apple appeals against ‘unprecedented’ €500m EU fine over app store | Apple | The Guardian

收听本期播客

阅读正文

In a major development in the technology sector, Apple, the global tech giant behind the iPhone, has launched an appeal against a substantial 500 million euro fine imposed by the European Union. This penalty, roughly equivalent to 430 million pounds, was issued by the European Commission in April 2025. The Commission, which serves as the EU’s executive authority, accused Apple of violating the Digital Markets Act, a regulation designed to promote fair competition in the digital landscape. The specific charge against Apple was that it restricted app developers from guiding users to more affordable alternatives outside its App Store, a practice referred to as ‘steering.’

The App Store has long been the primary platform for developers to reach iPhone users, but Apple’s strict policies have often prevented developers from informing customers about cheaper options available elsewhere. The EU argues that this stifles competition and results in higher prices for consumers. Following the ruling, Apple was compelled to adjust its policies in June 2025 to avoid even harsher penalties, which could amount to 5% of its daily global revenue—approximately 50 million euros per day. While the company introduced new fee structures, Apple claims these changes have created confusion among developers and diminished the user experience.

In its appeal, filed with the EU’s second-highest court, Apple contends that the European Commission has overstepped the boundaries of the law. The company argues that the fine and the ruling go beyond what is required and accuses the Commission of broadening the definition of steering in an unfair manner. This, Apple says, complicates its ability to manage how developers interact with customers both within and outside the App Store. Meanwhile, tensions between US technology firms and the EU are escalating, with some American critics, including a trade adviser to Donald Trump, labeling the EU’s actions as ‘lawfare’—using regulations to target US businesses.

The result of this appeal could shape the future of digital market regulations in Europe. A spokesperson for the European Commission expressed confidence in defending their decision in court. This ongoing dispute raises important questions about fairness and competition in the tech industry, and whether large corporations should be required to alter their business models to ensure a level playing field, even at the cost of their profits.

阅读练习

1. What is the main reason Apple was fined by the European Union?

  • A. For overcharging customers on the App Store
  • B. For restricting developers from offering cheaper alternatives
  • C. For failing to update its App Store policies
  • D. For violating international trade agreements

2. What change did Apple make following the EU ruling?

  • A. It reduced the prices of apps on the App Store.
  • B. It removed all restrictions on developers.
  • C. It introduced new fee structures.
  • D. It shut down the App Store temporarily.

3. How does Apple view the European Commission’s actions?

  • A. As a fair response to their policies
  • B. As an overreach of legal authority
  • C. As a helpful guide for future changes
  • D. As a minor inconvenience to their business

4. What potential penalty did Apple face if it did not comply with the EU ruling?

  • A. A fine of 500 million euros per year
  • B. A daily fine of up to 5% of its global revenue
  • C. A complete ban on App Store operations in Europe
  • D. A mandatory reduction in app prices by 5%

5. What broader issue does the dispute between Apple and the EU highlight?

  • A. The need for better app development standards
  • B. The importance of user privacy in digital markets
  • C. The challenge of ensuring fair competition in the tech industry
  • D. The difficulty of enforcing international technology laws